
Stephen J. Teti

Practice Areas
Education
Court Admissions
Support Staff
Overview
Steve Teti is Senior Counsel for the firm, and practices in the firm’s antitrust and e-discovery groups. Steve graduated magna cum laude from the Quinnipiac University School of Law in 2010, where he served as Publications Editor of the Quinnipiac Law Review. After law school, Steve clerked for the judges of the Connecticut Superior Court, and then practiced antitrust, securities, and consumer class litigation at two nationally-recognized plaintiffs’ law firms in Connecticut and Massachusetts.
Representative Cases
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig., No. 16-cv-08637 (N.D. Ill.);
- In re Pork Antitrust Litig., No. 18-cv-01776 (D. Minn.);
- In re Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litig., No. 18-cv-06785 (N.D. Ill.);
- Jien v. Perdue Farms, Inc., et al., No. 19-cv-2521 (D. Md.) (Poultry Wages Antitrust Litigation);
- In re Thalomid & Revlimid Antitrust Litig., No. 14-cv-6997 (D.N.J.) ($34 million settlement on behalf of end payor class);
- City of Birmingham Ret. & Relief Sys. v. MetLife, Inc., No. CV-2012-902101 (Ala. Cir. Ct.) ($9.75 million settlement);
- Rosenberg v. Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc., No. 2014 CV 818140 (Ohio Ct. Com. Pleas ($10 million settlement);
- Niitsoo v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., No. AD-303-2014 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pleas) ($3.6 million settlement);
- In re Home Depot Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litig., No. 14-md-02583 (N.D. Ga.) ($27.25 million settlement; served on Plaintiffs’ Coordination & Discovery Committee);
- In re Target Corp. Customer Data Security Breach Litig., No. 14-md-02522 (D. Minn.) ($59 million settlement);
- WinSouth Credit Union v. Mapco Express, Inc., No. 14-cv-01573 (M.D. Tenn.) (largest dollar-per-card settlement obtained on behalf of financial institutions involving data breach of credit and debit card information);
- Friedman v. Maspeth Fed. Loan & Savings Ass’n, 30 F. Supp. 3d 183 (E.D.N.Y. 2014) (Weinstein, J.) (in case raising “issues of first impression on the reach of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act,” Steve defeated a motion to dismiss and later obtained a settlement that reimbursed consumers for 100% of their losses in the case which involved wrongful imposition of late charges on timely-received mortgage payments)